Volume 4, Issue 2 (4-2022)                   kurmanj 2022, 4(2): 1-10 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Yousefi M, Shah Mansouri B, Hashemi S. Exploring Mobile Social Media Use and Deviance in Islamic Spousal Obligations among Married Women in Tehran and Istanbul. kurmanj 2022; 4 (2) :1-10
URL: http://kurmanj.srpub.org/article-2-137-en.html
Assistant Professor of Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch
Abstract:   (363 Views)
Employing a descriptive survey design, this study aimed to investigate the extent to which married women, with dominant Islamic backgrounds, frequented mobile social media, perceived reasons for it and in what ways their activities/relationships deviated from the established Islamic spousal obligations. To this effect, a sample size of 384 married women from Tehran and Istanbul, filled a researcher-made questionnaire distributed through various mobile social media networks. The questionnaire posed questions about the type of and the extent to which mobile social media was used, the personal and social activities/ relationships they engaged in and prevalent within the mobile social media frequented. The results revealed some similarities and differences between the two groups’ responses to the questionnaire. The percentage and the extent to which the respondents perceived mobile social media use promoted non-traditional friendships with the opposite sex, discussions on devaluing the importance of the ‘Hijab’, the imitation of diverse fashion, and opportunities to gain more attention from the opposite sex, were the highest and similar in both cities. Furthermore, a vast majority, in both groups, felt that the exchanges and posts in the media demonstrated a decline in both the observance of moral principles and limitations to relationships between men and women but an increase in unconventional (sexual) messages/ exchanges related to very private topics/experiences and diverse/adverse types of thoughts among users and the wide acceptance of infidelity as a common/acceptable behavior. However, married women in Tehran perceived that their activities and relationships online not only made their spouses seem less desirable but also more sensitive towards their behavior than their Istanbul counterparts. Thus, this study’s contribution to existing literature is that it identifies social relationship patterns and activities of married women in Tehran and Istanbul that violated Islamic spousal obligations enshrined in the Quran and described by the learned of Islam as ‘haram’ (prohibited).
 

 
Full-Text [PDF 350 kb]   (119 Downloads)    
Humanities: Research | Subject: Media Technology
Received: 2022/02/15 | Revised: 2022/03/16 | Accepted: 2022/03/30 | Published: 2022/04/10

References
1. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite: The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1)59-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003. [DOI:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003]
2. Brown, S. (2010). From VLEs to learning webs: the implication of Web 2.0 for learning and teaching. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(1) 1-10. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820802102158983. [DOI:10.1080/10494820802158983]
3. Schroeder, A., Minocha, S., & Schneider, C. (2010). Social Software in Higher Education: The Diversity of Applications and Their Contributions to Students' Learning Experiences. Communications of the Association for Information systems, 25(1), 547-564. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol26/iss1/25/ [DOI:10.17705/1CAIS.02625]
4. McKenna, A. S., Green, M. E. J., & Gleason. (2002). Relationship formation on the internet: What's the big attraction? J. Soc. Issues, 58, 9-31. [DOI:10.1111/1540-4560.00246]
5. Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personal Individual Differ, 52, 243-249. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Berger, J. (2014). Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24 (4), 586-607. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.002]
7. Kozinets, R. V., De Valck, K., Wojnicki, A. C., & Wilner, S. J. S. (2010). Networked narratives: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing, 74 (2), 71-89. [DOI:10.1509/jm.74.2.71]
8. Young, S. D., Jordan, A. H. (2013). The influence of social networking photos on social norms and sexual health behaviors. CyberPsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 16, 243-247 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]. [DOI:10.1089/cyber.2012.0080] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Thilakarathna, M. T. K., Viana, A., Seneviratne, A., & H. Petander, (2013). Mobile social networking through friend-to-friend opportunistic content dissemination. ACM MobiHoc, pp. 263-266. [DOI:10.1145/2491288.2491319]
10. Hjarvard, S. (2011). The mediatisation of religion: Theorising religion, media and social change. Culture & Religion, 12, 119-135 [Google Scholar]. [DOI:10.1080/14755610.2011.579719]
11. De Angeli A. (2009). Cultural variations in virtual spaces design. AI & Society, 24, 213-223 [Google Scholar]. [DOI:10.1007/s00146-009-0212-7]
12. Omoush, A., Saleh, K., & Yaseen, S. G. (2012). The impact of Arab cultural values on online social networking: the case of Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 2387-2399 [Google Scholar]. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.010]
13. Sohrabi-Haghighat, M. H. (2013). New media and social-political change in Iran. Online Journal of the Virtual Middle East. www.cyberorient.net/article.do?articleId=6187.
14. Chatfield, A. T., Akbari, R., & Mirzayi N. (2012). Interactive effects of networked publics and social media on transforming the public sphere: a survey of Iran's leaderless "social media revolution. In System Science (HICSS) 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, Hawaii [Google Scholar]. [DOI:10.1109/HICSS.2012.336]
15. Farrugia, R. C. (2013). Facebook and Relationships: A Study of How Social Media Use is Affecting Long-Term Relationships. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
16. Hamburger, A. ( 2013). The social net: Understanding our online behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
17. Steinfield, C., Ellison, N., Lampe, C., & Vitak, J. (2012). Online social network sites and the concept of social capital. F.L. Lee, L. Leung, J.S. Qiu, D. Chu (Eds.), Frontiers in New Media Research, Routledge, New York, pp. 115-131.
18. Zhong, Z-J. (2011). The effects of collective MMORPG (Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games) play on gamers' online and offline social capital Compute. Hum Behave, 27, 2352-2363. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.014]
19. Al-Ali, N. (2000). Secularism, gender and the state in the Middle East: The Egyptian women's movement. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press [Google Scholar]. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511489518]
20. Rahimi, B. (2007). The politics of the Internet in Iran. Media, culture and society in Iran: living with globalization and the Islamic state. New York: Routledge [Google Scholar].
21. Sümer, S., & Eslen-Zyia, H. (2015). New Waves for Old Rights? Women's Mobilization and Bodily Rights in Turkey and Norway. European Journal of Women's Studies 24(1). [DOI:10.1177/1350506815619878]
22. Abdurezak A. (2011). Islamic ethics: An Outline of its Principles and Scope., 1(3): 122-130.
23. Helsper, E. J., & M. T. Whitty, M. T. (2010). Netiquette within married couples: Agreement about acceptable online behavior and surveillance between partners. Comput Human Behav, 26 (5), 916-926. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.006]
24. Clayton, R. B., Nagurney, A., & Smith, J. R. (2013). Cheating, Breakup, and Divorce: Is Facebook Use to Blame? Cyberpsychology, Behav. Soc. Netw, 16(10), 717-720. [DOI:10.1089/cyber.2012.0424] [PMID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.