Volume 2, Issue 1 (1-2020)
kurmanj 2020, 2(1): 1-10 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Honarkhah R, Zarei S, Ghaedi M. Measurement the difference gender perspective of social dimension satisfaction of quality of urban life in central texture of coastal city of Bandar Abbas. kurmanj 2020; 2 (1) :1-10
URL: http://kurmanj.srpub.org/article-2-28-en.html
URL: http://kurmanj.srpub.org/article-2-28-en.html
Young researchers and elite club,Bandar Abbas branch,Islamic azad university,Bandar Abbas,Iran
Abstract: (1335 Views)
Quality of life is a complex and multi-dimensional word of visualization from moment to moment of life experiences That is based on objective indicators as well as subjective indicators . In this research quality of urban life according to the definition by Cutter: Life satisfaction is meaningless . It is tried , to measure the amount of difference between men and women perceptions from satisfaction of quality of life in subjective indicators of social dimension in central texture of Bandar Abbas. Accordingly social dimension of quality of life indicators is collected by libraries and they have been developed and localization After consultations with professors and experts, In this research 158 people have participated that have responded to a questionnaire Likert spectrum . Data obtained from questionnaires have been analysis by using SPSS software and then were assessed by using t-test and nonparametric Kolmogorov-Smirinov , differences of opinion between men and women between the social indicators of quality of life . The results show that Quality of life in social dimension is located relatively moderate to high and In the number of indicators are significant differences in distribution of responsibility between women and men.
Humanities: Research |
Received: 2019/10/11 | Revised: 2020/01/20 | Accepted: 2020/01/25 | Published: 2020/01/31
Received: 2019/10/11 | Revised: 2020/01/20 | Accepted: 2020/01/25 | Published: 2020/01/31
References
1. Azimi, A., (2007), dimensions and indicators of quality of urban life, councils Journal, Issue 55.
2. Bazargan Harandi, Abbas, (2015), Introduction to qualitative and mixed methods research, common approaches in behavioral science, Fifth Edition, Tehran, Press Didar.
3. Costanza, R., (2007), "Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being", Ecological Economics, NO 61(2-3): 56-74. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.023]
4. Cutter,s,(1982) "Residential satisfaction and the suburban home owners" ,Urban geography,3,pp.315-327. [DOI:10.2747/0272-3638.3.4.315]
5. Das, D., (2008), "Urban Quality of Life: A case study of Guwahati", Social Indicators Research, 88,65-89. [DOI:10.1007/s11205-007-9191-6]
6. Delfim Saantos, Luise and Isabel Martin (2006) "Monitoring Urban Quality of Life Experience", Social Indicators Research, 80: 411-425. [DOI:10.1007/s11205-006-0002-2]
7. Gifford, Robert, (1998), perception and recognition, translator; Nasrin Dabashi, Journal of architecture and culture, No second and third.
8. Khadem-Al-hoseini, Ahmad, Mansurian, Hussein, Sattari, Muhammad Hussein, (2010), Measurement of Subjective quality of life in urban areas (Case Study: City Nurabad, Lorestan Province), Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies, First Year, Issue 3, Spring 2010.
9. Kokabee, Afshin. (2007), "Criteria for assessing the quality of urban life in urban centers", Journal of the identity of the city, No. 1, 86-75.
10. Lovejoy,K.,Handy,S.,&Mokhtarian,P.(2010).Neighborhood Satisfaction in suburban versus traditional environments:An evaluation of contributing characteristics in eight California neighborhoods.Landscape and Urban Planning . 97(1),37-48. [DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.04.010]
11. Mahdizadeh, Javad. (1999), Accounting criteria Industries and utilities, Volume I, Tehran, publisher of the country's municipalities.
12. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164-172. [DOI:10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.164]
13. Qafari, G. Omidi, R., (2006) and quality of life, social development index, published headband.
14. sarrafi,M.(2003),Concepts,Principles and challenges of urban management, urbanmanagement journal,no.2:68-61.
15. Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Psychology: In search of the human mind. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.12.1069
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.332 [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.360]
16. Uzell.(2006). "Environment and quality of life", Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée 56, pp 1-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.erap.2005.02.007]
17. VanKamp van Irene, Leidelmeijer Kees, Gooitske Marsman, Hollander Augustinus. (2003), "Urban environmental quality and human well-beingtowards a conceptual framework and demarcationof concepts; a literature study" Landscape and Urban Planning 65 5-18. [DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00232-3]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |