دوره 5، شماره 1 - ( 12-1401 )                   جلد 5 شماره 1 صفحات 12-1 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها

‎ 10.47176/kurmanj.5.1.1

XML English Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Arab Bafrani H, Shahrokhi Kahnooj H, Khaksar S. A Combination of Art, Creativity and Neuroscience. kurmanj 2023; 5 (1) :1-12
URL: http://kurmanj.srpub.org/article-2-177-fa.html
عرب بفرانی حمیده، شاهرخی کهنوج حدیث، خاکسار سپیده. هنر، خلاقیت و علوم اعصاب. کرمانج؛ نشریه فرهنگ ، اجتماع و علوم انسانی. 1401; 5 (1) :1-12

URL: http://kurmanj.srpub.org/article-2-177-fa.html

هنر، خلاقیت و علوم اعصاب
حمیده عرب بفرانی* ، حدیث شاهرخی کهنوج ، سپیده خاکسار
کارشناسی بیوتکنولوژی، گروه بیوتکنولوژی، دانشکده علوم زیستی، دانشگاه الزهرا، تهران، ایران.
چکیده:   (417 مشاهده)
مفهوم خلاقیت جنبه های مختلفی دارد. چه این یک عمل ساده نوآوری باشد یا یک کار بزرگ نبوغ، خلاقیت و نوآوری شیوه زندگی، تفکر و باور ما را شکل می دهد. با مطالعات موردی هنرمندان مبتلا به بیماری‌های عصبی و تجربیات آن‌ها با بیماری‌شان، ساختار خلاقیت را مرور می‌کنیم، مکانیسم‌های عصبی زیربنای این اثرات را توصیف می‌کنیم و تأثیرات هنر بر خلاقیت را توضیح می‌دهیم. در روانشناسی و علوم اعصاب، خلاقیت موضوعی است که بسیار مورد توجه است، اما یافته های مطالعات همیشه سازگار نیستند. یک حوزه دشوار برای مطالعه ممکن است تا حدی یافته های متناقض را در مورد خلاقیت توضیح دهد. با این وجود، خلاقیت یک عنصر حیاتی از فرهنگ بشری است که تعریف آن سخت و حتی دشوارتر از به دست آوردن آن است. تفکر خلاق به روش های مختلف توسط محققان مختلف و همچنین پارادایم ها و توضیحات متفاوتی برای نحوه عملکرد آن ترسیم شده است.
واژه‌های کلیدی: خلاقیت، هنر، علوم اعصاب
متن کامل [PDF 403 kb]   (412 دریافت)    
علوم انسانی: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: هنر و علوم انسانی (عمومی)
دریافت: 1401/8/24 | ویرایش نهایی: 1401/10/19 | پذیرش: 1401/10/28 | انتشار: 1401/11/5
فهرست منابع
1. Aharon I, et al. Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence. Neuron, 2001; 32(3): 537-551. [DOI:10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00491-3] [PMID]
2. Shavinina LV. The international handbook on innovation. Elsevier. 2003.
3. Sternberg RJ. Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press. 1999.
4. Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins. 1996; 56: 107.
5. Carlsson I, Wendt PE, Risberg J. On the neurobiology of creativity. Differences in frontal activity between high and low creative subjects. Neuropsychol. 2000; 38(6): 873-885. [DOI:10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00128-1] [PMID]
6. Heilman KM. Creativity and the brain. Psychology press. 2005. [DOI:10.4324/9780203942895]
7. Miller BL, et al. Functional correlates of musical and visual ability in frontotemporal dementia. Br J Psychiatr. 2000; 176(5): 458-463. [DOI:10.1192/bjp.176.5.458] [PMID]
8. Gorno‐Tempini ML, et al. Cognition and anatomy in three variants of primary progressive aphasia. Annals of Neurology: Official Journal of the American Neurological Association and the Child Neurology Society, 2004; 55(3): 335-346. [DOI:10.1002/ana.10825] [PMID] []
9. Miller BL, et al. Emergence of artistic talent in frontotemporal dementia. Neurol. 1998; 51(4): 978-982. [DOI:10.1212/WNL.51.4.978] [PMID]
10. Mell JC, Howard SM, Miller BL. Art and the brain: the influence of frontotemporal dementia on an accomplished artist. Neurol. 2003; 60(10): 1707-1710. [DOI:10.1212/01.WNL.0000064164.02891.12] [PMID]
11. Finney GR, Heilman KM. Artwork before and after onset of progressive nonfluent aphasia. Cognit Behav Neurol. 2007; 20(1): 7-10. [DOI:10.1097/WNN.0b013e31802b6c1f] [PMID]
12. Drago V, et al. What's inside the art? The influence of frontotemporal dementia in art production. Neurol. 2006; 67(7): 1285-1287. [DOI:10.1212/01.wnl.0000238439.77764.da] [PMID]
13. Kapur N. Paradoxical functional facilitation in brain-behaviour research: A critical review. Brain, 1996; 119(5): 1775-1790. [DOI:10.1093/brain/119.5.1775] [PMID]
14. Chatterjee A, Coslett HB. The roots of cognitive neuroscience: Behavioral neurology and neuropsychology. Oxford University Press. 2013. [DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195395549.001.0001]
15. Robertson L, Lamb M, Knight R. Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans. J Neurosci. 1988; 8(10): 3757-3769. [DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-10-03757.1988] [PMID] []
16. Benton A, Tranel D. Visuoperceptual, visuospatial, and visuoconstructive disorders. 1993.
17. Jaušovec N, Jaušovec K. Differences in resting EEG related to ability. Brain Topogr. 2000; 12(3): 229-240. [DOI:10.1023/A:1023446024923] [PMID]
18. EDISON T. Disponível em:< http://www. thomasedison. com>. Acesso em. 29.
19. Snyder A, Bossomaier T, Mitchell DJ. Concept formation:'object'attributes dynamically inhibited from conscious awareness. J Integrat Neurosci. 2004; 3(01): 31-46. [DOI:10.1142/S0219635204000361] [PMID]
20. Flaherty AW. Frontotemporal and dopaminergic control of idea generation and creative drive. J Comp Neurol. 2005; 493(1): 147-153. [DOI:10.1002/cne.20768] [PMID] []
21. Gabriëls L, et al. Deep brain stimulation for treatment‐refractory obsessive‐compulsive disorder: psychopathological and neuropsychological outcome in three cases. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2003; 107(4): 275-282. [DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00066.x] [PMID]
22. Chavez R, et al. Neurobiology of creativity: Preliminary results from a brain activation study. Salud Ment. 2004; 27(3): 38-46.
23. Bechtereva NP, et al. PET study of brain maintenance of verbal creative activity. Int J Psychophysiol. 2004; 53(1): 11-20. [DOI:10.1016/S0167-8760(00)00092-1] [PMID]
24. Lewis RT. Organic signs, creativity, and personality characteristics of patients following cerebral commissurotomy. Clin Neuropsychol. 1979.
25. Heilman KM, Nadeau SE, Beversdorf DO. Creative innovation: possible brain mechanisms. Neurocase, 2003; 9(5): 369-379. [DOI:10.1076/neur.9.5.369.16553] [PMID]
26. McClelland JL, Rumelhart DE, Group PR. Parallel Distributed Processing, Volume 2: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition: Psychological and Biological Models. MIT press. 1987; 2. [DOI:10.7551/mitpress/5237.001.0001]
27. Mednick S. The associative basis of the creative process. Psychol Rev. 1962; 69(3): 220. [DOI:10.1037/h0048850] [PMID]
28. Richards R, et al. Creativity in manic-depressives, cyclothymes, their normal relatives, and control subjects. J Abnorm Psychol. 1988; 97(3): 281. [DOI:10.1037/0021-843X.97.3.281] [PMID]
29. Jung RE, Vartanian O. The Cambridge handbook of the neuroscience of creativity. Cambridge University Press. 2018. [DOI:10.1017/9781316556238]
30. Chatterjee A. The neuropsychology of visual art: Conferring capacity. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2006; 74: 39-49. [DOI:10.1016/S0074-7742(06)74003-X] [PMID]
31. Walker MP, et al. Cognitive flexibility across the sleep-wake cycle: REM-sleep enhancement of anagram problem solving. Cognit Brain Res. 2002; 14(3): 317-324. [DOI:10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00134-9] [PMID]
32. Baird B, et al. Inspired by distraction: Mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychol Sci. 2012; 23(10): 1117-1122. [DOI:10.1177/0956797612446024] [PMID]
33. Burnett AL, et al. Noncholinergic penile erection in mice lacking the gene for endothelial nitric oxide synthase. J Androl. 2002; 23(1): 92-97. [DOI:10.1002/j.1939-4640.2002.tb02601.x] [PMID]
34. Lippelt DP, Hommel B, Colzato LS. Focused attention, open monitoring and loving kindness meditation: effects on attention, conflict monitoring, and creativity: A review. Front Psychol. 2014; 5: 1083. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01083] [PMID] []
35. Capurso V, Fabbro F, Crescentini C. Mindful creativity: the influence of mindfulness meditation on creative thinking. Front Psychol. 2014; 4: 1020. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.01020] [PMID] []
36. Cross I. Musicality and the human capacity for culture. Music Sci. 2008; 12(1_suppl): 147-167. [DOI:10.1177/1029864908012001071]
37. Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W. The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. J Conscious Stud. 1999; 6(6-7): 15-51.
38. Tinio PP. From artistic creation to aesthetic reception: The mirror model of art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2013; 7(3): 265. [DOI:10.1037/a0037609]
39. Manturzewska M. A biographical study of the life-span development of professional musicians. Psychol Music, 1990; 18(2): 112-139. [DOI:10.1177/0305735690182002]
40. Hutchinson S, et al. Cerebellar volume of musicians. Cerebral Cortex, 2003; 13(9): 943-949. [DOI:10.1093/cercor/13.9.943] [PMID]
41. Gaser C, Schlaug G. Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(27): 9240-9245. [DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-27-09240.2003] [PMID] []
42. McPherson M, Limb CJ. Difficulties in the neuroscience of creativity: Jazz improvisation and the scientific method. Ann New York Acad Sci. 2013; 1303(1): 80-83. [DOI:10.1111/nyas.12174] [PMID]
43. Bhattacharya J, Petsche H. Shadows of artistry: cortical synchrony during perception and imagery of visual art. Cognit Brain Res. 2002; 13(2): 179-186. [DOI:10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00110-0] [PMID]
44. Fink A, Graif B, Neubauer AC. Brain correlates underlying creative thinking: EEG alpha activity in professional vs. novice dancers. NeuroImage, 2009; 46(3): 854-862. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.036] [PMID]
45. Kowatari Y, et al. Neural networks involved in artistic creativity. Hum Brain Map. 2009; 30(5): 1678-1690. [DOI:10.1002/hbm.20633] [PMID] []
46. Abraham A. The neuroscience of creativity. Cambridge University Press. 2018. [DOI:10.1017/9781316816981]
47. Contreras-Vidal JL, et al. Mobile Brain-Body Imaging and the Neuroscience of Art, Innovation and Creativity. Springer. 2019. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-24326-5]
48. Dietrich A. How creativity happens in the brain (1st ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 2015. [DOI:10.1057/9781137501806_1] []
49. Gregory E, Hardiman M, Yarmolinskaya J, Rinne L, Limb C. Building creative thinking in the classroom: from research to practice. Int J Educ Res. 2013; 62: 43-50. [DOI:10. 1016/j.ijer.2013.06.003]
50. Sawyer RK, Berson S. Study group discourse: how external representations affect collaborative conversation. Linguist Educ. 2004; 15(4); 387-412. [DOI:10.1016/j.linged.2005.03.002]
51. Lonergan DC, Scott GM, Mumford MD. Evaluative aspects of creative thought: effects of appraisal and revision standards. Creat Res J. 2004; 16(2): 231-246. [DOI:10.1080/10400419.2004.9651455]
52. Rostan SM. Studio learning: motivation, competence, and the development of young art students' talent and creativity. Creat Res J. 2010; 22(3): 261-271. [DOI:10.1080/10400419.2010.503533
]
53. Csikszentmihalyi M. Assessing aesthetic education: measuring the ability to "ward off chaos". Art Educ Pol Rev. 1997; 99(1): 33-38. [DOI:10.1080/10632919709600763
]
54. Welch M, Barlex D, Lim HS. Sketching: friend or foe to the novice designer? Int J Technol Des Educ. 2000; 10(2): 125-148. [DOI:10.1023/A:1008991319644]
55. Asbury C, Rich B. The Dana consortium report on arts and cognition: Learning, arts, and the brain. New York: Dana.(im Internet verfügbar, Aufruf 2011). 2008.
ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
CAPTCHA
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول

بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.