Volume 8, Issue 2 (6-2026)
kurmanj 2026, 8(2): 13-23 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Balash F, Amiri H, Gheidari A. Anti-Education as a Critical Framework: Structural Barriers, Dialectical Learning, and the Reclamation of Emancipation. kurmanj 2026; 8 (2) :13-23
URL: http://kurmanj.srpub.org/article-2-301-en.html
URL: http://kurmanj.srpub.org/article-2-301-en.html
1- Faculty Member, Iman Mobin International Research Center , Efarhaddevelopment@gmail.com
2- Department of Clinical Psychology, Medicine Faculty, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
3- PhD Candidate in Educational Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Clinical Psychology, Medicine Faculty, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
3- PhD Candidate in Educational Psychology, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (244 Views)
This article explores the concept of anti-education as a critical framework for analyzing the structural barriers that obstruct authentic learning. Building on Illich’s critique of institutionalized schooling, Freire’s dialogical pedagogy, and Giroux’s critical pedagogy, the study situates anti-education not as a rejection of teaching but as a theoretical tool for exposing systemic suppression of dialectical learning. Using a behaviorological perspective, education is approached as a structural mechanism that regulates behavior, reproduces cultural norms, and sustains existing power relations. The article identifies three interrelated mechanisms of suppression: (1) the imposition of predetermined curricula and standardized assessments; (2) the reproduction of social hierarchies through teacher–student power asymmetries; and (3) the normalization of conformity via hidden curricula and disciplinary practices. Through this analysis, anti-education emerges as a conceptual lens that unmasks the systemic reproduction of authority within educational institutions. The innovative contribution of this article lies in synthesizing critical realism, dialectics, and behaviorology into a unified framework. Critical realism provides ontological depth by analyzing how structures generate inequalities. Dialectics reveals the contradictions within education, where the promise of emancipation is continually obstructed by reproduction. Behaviorology adds empirical precision, demonstrating how reinforcement and punishment regulate conduct at the micro-level. Together, these perspectives reconstruct anti-education as a rigorous critical framework capable of diagnosing suppression while envisioning emancipatory alternatives. By integrating structural critique with philosophical rigor and empirical clarity, this article contributes to critical educational theory and offers a pathway for reimagining education beyond institutional control. The findings underscore the necessity of dismantling structural barriers to reclaim learning as a dialectical and transformative process.
Humanities: Research |
Subject:
language teaching
Received: 2026/02/11 | Revised: 2026/04/17 | Accepted: 2026/06/15 | Published: 2026/06/23
Received: 2026/02/11 | Revised: 2026/04/17 | Accepted: 2026/06/15 | Published: 2026/06/23
References
1. Apple, M. W. . Ideology and curriculum. RoutledgeFalmer.. 2004. [DOI:10.4324/9780203487563] [PMCID]
2. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. . Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage.. 1977.
3. Bourdieu, P. . The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.. 1990. [DOI:10.1515/9781503621749]
4. Boyatzis, R. E. . Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.. 1998.
5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. . Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. 2006.]
6. Bhaskar, R. . Dialectic: The pulse of freedom . Routledge.. 2008. [DOI:10.4324/9780203892633]
7. Skinner, B. F. . Beyond freedom and dignity. Knopf.. 1971.
8. Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. . Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92. [DOI:10.1177/160940690600500107]
9. Foucault, M. . Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison . Penguin.. 1991.
10. Goffman, E. . Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Anchor Books.. 1961.
11. Hooks, b. . Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.. 1994.
12. Illich, I. . Deschooling society. Harper & Row.. 1971.
13. Joffe, H. . Thematic analysis. In D. Harper & A. R. Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy (pp. 209-223). Wiley-Blackwell.. 2012 [DOI:10.1002/9781119973249.ch15]
14. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. . Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. Basic Books.. 1976.
15. Mezirow, J. . Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.. 1991.
16. Peperzak, A. . Modern freedom: Hegel's legal, moral, and political philosophy. Kluwer Academic.. 2001. [DOI:10.1007/978-94-010-0856-3]
17. Vandenberghe, F. . The real is relational: An inquiry into Pierre Bourdieu's constructivist epistemology. Sociological Theory, 17(1), 32-67.
https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00065 [DOI:10.1111/0735-2751.00065. 1999.]
18. Taylor, C. . Hegel. Cambridge University Press.. 1975. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139171465]
19. Archer, M. . Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge University Press.. 2000. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511488733]
20. Giroux, H. A. . On critical pedagogy. Bloomsbury.. 2011.
21. Willis, P. . Learning to labour: How working-class kids get working-class jobs. Columbia University Press.. 1977.
22. Selwyn, N. . Education and technology: Key issues and debates . Bloomsbury.. 2016. [DOI:10.5040/9781474235952]
23. Freire, P. . Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.. 1970.
24. Ellsworth, E. . Why doesn't this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297-324.. 1989. [DOI:10.17763/haer.59.3.058342114k266250]
25. Jenkins, R. . Pierre Bourdieu . Routledge.. 2002.
26. Sayer, A. . Why things matter to people: Social science, values and ethical life. Cambridge University Press.. 2011. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511734779]
27. Chomsky, N. . A review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior. Language, 35(1), 26-58.. 1959. [DOI:10.2307/411334]
28. Kaidesoja, T. . Naturalizing critical realist social ontology. Routledge.. 2013. [DOI:10.4324/9780203753484]
29. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. . Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91-97.. 1968. [DOI:10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91] [PMID] [PMCID]
30. Hegel, G. W. F. . The phenomenology of spirit . Cambridge University Press.. 2018.
31. Marx, K. . Theses on Feuerbach. In R. C. Tucker (Ed.), The Marx-Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 143-145). W. W. Norton.. 1978.
32. Bhaskar, R. . A realist theory of science . Routledge.. 2008.
33. Archer, M. . Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University Press.. 1995. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511557675]
34. Aronowitz, S. . The crisis in historical materialism: Class, politics and culture in Marxist theory. Praeger.. 1981.
35. Sawyer, R. K. . Social emergence: Societies as complex systems. Cambridge University Press.. 2005. [DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511734892]
36. Biesta, G. . Learning democracy in school and society: Education, lifelong learning, and the politics of citizenship. Springer.. 2011 [DOI:10.1007/978-94-6091-512-3] [PMCID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |